Check out 16 Return-To-Work Programs In India For Ambitious Women Like You!
It is chilling to realise how the creepy actions of Harvey Weinstein had permeated Hollywood, causing many to turn a blind eye to what should have been evident.
If Darwinism is the theory of the evolution of species by natural selection then Harveyism is the evolution of Hollywood by – you guessed it – Harvey’s (or should we say little Harvey’s) selection.
Jokes apart, Harvey Weinstein was called God by Meryl Streep, who is arguably the greatest living actor in American History, and even she was duped (?) by his Mr. Nice Guy Act. Meryl’s regrettable “I had no idea of such going ons” statement reeks of hypocrisy but I find it hard to blame her. If she had paid heed to all the murmurings around little Harvey’s escapades she may have never reached the pedestal she now occupies and uses to champion feminist causes.
How many of us have looked the other way when faced with a similar situation? A person who has the power to make or break your career, has behaved despicably with an acquaintance of yours but is a perfect gentleman to you, would you still blow the whistle? Wouldn’t you brush it off saying “None of my business, he’s never tried that with me and nothing’s been proved” and proceed to put your blinders on?
Meryl did exactly that, she shut everything out and focused on setting a bench mark for the next generation of actresses. Small wonder that Kate Winslet who looks up to Meryl has taken the same stand. Kate’s token show of defiance saying “I deliberately never thanked Harvey” does not pass muster.
Getting down to the facts– Harvey Weinstein has been thanked a total of 34 times in Oscar acceptance speeches since 1966 by actors and actresses – just as many times as God, and second only to Steven Spielberg with 43 mentions. There is no shying away from the fact that Harvey is a brilliant filmmaker, and powerful movie Moghuls trading in sexual favours for a break in the movies is as old as Hollywood itself. For every woman who has been violated by his perverted behaviour there may have been many who have willingly, albeit disgustedly, consented and I’m sure their crosses are heavy to bear.
They are innumerable Harveys in Holly, Bolly and all the other woods, their behaviour egged on with the first few consents and every “no” coming their way representing a challenge, the pursuit of which gives them the same warped pleasure as the end goal itself. The shock and anger registered by the Hollywood male actors though, is disappointing to say the least. Perpetrators like Harvey usually like to blab about their conquests and he must have found a willing audience in them as most of them have been his protégés. Hell must have a special place reserved for these men.
In Bollywood, Kangana’s alienation from her fraternity is disheartening. With her talent she should be ruling the roost but it is only the ones who play by the rules that manage to reach the top. Hopefully with more women setting up production houses and controlling the purse strings the odds will be stacked in their favour. Until then “Harveyism” will prevail.
Image source: Foxnews video clip
Roopa Prabhakar describes herself as a mother, a working woman, a closet feminist and blogger. read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
If her home and family seem to be impacted by her career then we expect her to prioritize her ‘responsibilities at home as a woman’ and leave her job.
The entrenched patriarchal norms have always perpetuated certain roles and responsibilities as falling specifically in the domain of either men or women. Traditionally, women have been associated with the domestic sphere while men have been considered the bread winner of the household. This division of roles has become so ingrained in our lives that we seldom come to question it. However, while not being questioned does give the system a certain level of legitimacy, it in no way proves its veracity.
This systematic division has resulted in a widely accepted notion whereby the public sphere is demarcated as a men’s zone and the private sphere as belonging to women. Consequently, women are expected to stay at home and manage the household chores while men are supposed to go out and make a living with no interest whatsoever in the running of the household.
This divide is said to be grounded in the intrinsic nature of men and women. Women are believed to be compassionate, affectionate and loving and these supposedly ‘feminine’ qualities make them the right fit for caring roles. Men, on the other hand are allegedly more sturdy, strong and bold and hence, the ones to deal with the ordeals of the outside world.
Investing in women means many things beyond the obvious meaning of this IWD2024 theme, as the many orgs doing stellar work can show us.
What does it mean to invest in women?
Telling the women in our lives how great we think they are? That we value the sacrifices they have made? (Usually though not necessarily only – a sacrifice of their aspirations, careers and earning potential in order to focus on family).
No, thank you. Just talk is no longer going to cut it. Roses and compliments are great, but it’s time people, leaders, organizations put their money, capital, resources on track instead.
Please enter your email address